Trump oder clinton wer ist besser

The charitable foundation rechnung Clinton set up in 2001 now casts a shadow end Hillary’s project due kommen sie potential conflict von interest v the state department


*

Hillary Clinton stands at the podium as bill Clinton leaves die stage during ns opening everyone session of the Clinton global Initiative in 2014. Photograph: john Moore/Getty Images
Hillary Clinton stand at die podium as rechnung Clinton leaves the stage during the opening everyone session of the Clinton global Initiative an 2014. Photograph: john Moore/Getty Images

Bill Clinton spoke the end on Wednesday v a heartfelt defence des the charitable foundation that he set up fünfzehn years ago und that now casts a shadow end his wife Hillary’s presidential campaign.

Du schaust: Trump oder clinton wer ist besser

“We’re trying zu do great things,” he told reporters in Atlanta. “If yes sir something dorn with developing jobs und saving lives, i don’t know what that is. The people who gave die money knew specifically what they were doing. I schutz nothing kommen sie say, other than I’m yes, really proud of the work they’ve done.”


But the issue of a potential conflict des interest betwee the Clinton Foundation und state department, whereby Hillary was secretary native 2009 kommen sie 2013, has dogged herstellung election campaign this week, lastly taking some warm off rival donald Trump.

Interpretations range from corruption “bigger 보다 Watergate”, together former new York market Rudy Giuliani put it, kommen sie manufactured scandal. So late night TV organize Stephen Colbert summed up ns ambivalence: “The Clinton foundation scandal soil right hoch there as ‘maybe a thing’, which is the same ranking as bald guys v pony tails, because it may not be a crime however it sure don’t look at good.”

Smoke without fire? Suddenly ns Clinton foundation finds chin on trial.


*

Bill Clinton tours bei HIV/Aids care and treatment facility an 2006 in Maseru, Lesotho, south Africa. Photograph: getty Images

What zu sein the Clinton Foundation?

It was essentially rechnung Clinton’s prize to die perennially tricky question von what ex-presidents should do next. He is not the zuerst to produce a structure – und the Obama Foundation zu sein already punkt work – but he is the zuerst to schutz a spouse run for the White House. Hence the uniquely azer situation.

Bill Clinton launched ns public charity after leaving the White House in 2001. It sought kommen sie bring with each other governments, businesses and social groups zu tackle ns world’s many pressing problems: health, climate change, economic development und opportunities zum girls und women.

The Washington post wrote belastung year: “The Clinton foundation is in ingenious an equipment that can turn miscellaneous intangible – ns Clintons’ global goodwill – right into something tangible: money. Zum the Clintons’ charitable causes. Zum their aides und allies. And, indirectly, weil das the Clintons themselves.”

More than 6,000 donors who have already provided die Clinton charity with more than $2bn bei funding since its creation, the damit verbundenen Press reported. It has a staff des nearly 500 people.

The foundation plainly means a last to ns 42nd president. Addressing staff recently, bill Clinton commented: “I’ve done a lot of exciting things in my life, and I don’t think I’ve ever before done anything the I’ve loved this much as this foundation.” that admitted ns prospect des scaling it under “is favor a source canal zum me”.

Has ns foundation succeeded?

Larry Noble, basic counsel des the campaign Legal Center, says: “The structure does echt work. It’s notfall a sham organisation.”

It claims to oase “dramatically improved” the lebt of millions des people around the world. Clinton’s supporters say the enabled the number des people receiving HIV/Aids medication kommen sie soar from 200,000 kommen sie 11.5 million and supported physical education programmes the helped more than 18 million students.

Laura Seay, an academic that witnessed ns foundation’s arbeiten firsthand in east Africa, said: “The perspective that it zu sein some kind of slush akkumulation is based on a echt misunderstanding des what die Clinton structure does. Die Clintons don’t take it a salary from it.”

Seay was researching a phd from 2005 to 2007 an eastern democratic Republic von the Congo, wherein militias roamed und few aid organisations ventured. She recalled how, v Clinton foundation funding, ns Heal Africa hospital in Goma cure 60 HIV-positive Congolese children, most des whom survived. “I know teens & young adults who were children then & space alive heute because ns Clinton foundation saved their lives when nobody else would,” she tweeted.

Seay, assistant professor des government punkt Colby College in Waterville, Maine, add to in in interview: “The Clinton Foundation was the organisation that took die risk ~ above this. What that showed was that in really daunting circumstances you kann save a lot of lives und change the way a last of NGOs think around conflict zones. That really was remarkable.”

Clinton also used his benennen to negotiate with international pharmaceutical giants kommen sie slash die price von HIV/Aids drugs, Seay argues.

The structure has been specifically active bei Rwanda but notfall without criticism. According kommen sie the neu York Times, in 2011 it successfully lobbied Hillary Clinton’s zustand department kommen sie approve in unconventional clinical training programme there. A dispute over die plan was mediated by Cheryl Mills, who spent five years on die foundation board before switching kommen sie the zustand department.

Mehr sehen: Was Bedeutet Es Wenn Ein Mann Sagt Er Braucht Zeit, Translation In Context From German To English

The foundation’s banner event, the annual Clinton global Initiative meeting, ist a forum zum philanthropists zu announce capital commitments including, in 2007, $2m zu help build die Agahozo-Shalom Youth Village weil das orphans von the genocide und Aids.

Speaking von phone from Rwanda, that is director, Jean-Claude Nkulikiyimfura, says des the foundation: “It seems kommen sie be doing part very an excellent work bei the country. That work an health might be incredibly beneficial.”

Support from die foundation is so a superb phone call card zum non-government organization seeking various other partners, the adds. “Having ns Clinton structure name in the list von donors might encourage various other funders zu provide support.”


*

Talk nur host Jimmy Kimmel, bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton und Chelsea Clinton punkt a college student conference hinweisen Arizona zustand University in 2014. Photograph: matte York/AP

But ist it transparent?

The foundation agreed zu voluntarily disclose die names und donations of its contributors after Clinton was nominated kommen sie be secretary of state in late 2008, despite notfall being legally obliged zu do so. It holds an A rating from CharityWatch, having actually spent 88% des its budget plan on programmes fairly than overheads.

Its list des donors consists of Trump, who gave bolzen $100,000 und $250,000 in 2009 and has attend a meeting von the Clinton globalen Initiative. One Clinton ally, note Trump’s demands for a one-of-a-kind prosecutor zu look into ns foundation, says: “As a donor, Trump is calling for in investigation des himself.”

However, the Politifact webseite contends that ns foundation violated the memorandum of understanding with the zustand department with three far-reaching omissions, including not reporting a $500,000 donation native Algeria an 2010.

What ist the hauptsächlich allegation now?

Pay zum play. Donors to die foundation are stated to schutz jumped die queue and gained special access to the state department. The richtiger weg wrote this week: “More than hilfreich the human being outside ns government that met v Hillary Clinton while she was secretary des state offered money – one of two people personally or through suppliers or groups – to the Clinton Foundation. It’s an extraordinary relationship indicating herstellung possible ethics challenges if chosen president.”

The angemessen found that hinweisen least 85 von 154 people with privatgelände interests that either met or had actually phone conversations booked with Clinton also gave a linked total des $156m to her family’s charities. Trump, struggling in the polls, sensed an opening and piled on. “It’s hard zu tell where ns Clinton foundation ends und the state department begins,” he told a rally ~ above Wednesday night.

Giuliani fumed: “It zu sein now abundantly clean that ns Clintons set nach oben a business to benefit from windy office. They offered access and specific actions for money. This makes a mockery of herstellung promise kommen sie Congress und the president kommen sie keep die Clinton Foundation und the state department totally separate. An other words, they merged ns two into ns Clinton household racketeering enterprise.”

But Hillary Clinton insists the the charme was cherry choose from a subset of her schedule. She told cnn on Wednesday: “I recognize there’s a last of smoke and there’s no fire. This richtiger weg report? placed it an context, excludes almost 2,000 meetings i had with welt leaders, plus plenty of other meetings with government officials when ich was secretary des state. It looked weist a klein portion des my time.

“It drew the conclusion and made die suggestion that my meetings with people like ns late, great, Elie Wiesel, or Melinda Gates, or the Nobel prize winner, Muhammad Yunus to be somehow due to connections with die foundation instead des their zustand as very respected global leaders. That ist absurd. These room people ich was proud zu meet with, who any kind of secretary des state would schutz been proud kommen sie meet with and hear around their work and their insight.”

However, there has deshalb been a stable trickle of e-mails into the public domain the reveal exactly how donors search meetings through Clinton über trying zu call in favours from the foundation. Crown prinz Salman von Bahrain did get bei appointment however others go not, und the Clinton camp insists the meetings were arranged through official channels.

Hillary Clinton’s nearby aide Huma Abedin, who functions prominently in the emails, appears to embody the tension, having worked hinweisen the state department while also being contracted to ns Clinton Foundation.


*

Bill Clinton greets villagers after the visited die Godino health and wellness Center in August 2008 bei Debre Zeit, Ethiopia. Photograph: justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Access is one thing, but is there a cigarette smoking gun the proves international donors affected Clinton’s decision-making together secretary des state?

No. Evidence des a causal link has not kommen sie to light, at least not yet. Elizabeth Trudeau, a spokesperson for the zustand department, says: “The state department zu sein not aware des any actions that were influenced von the Clinton Foundation.” There zu sein no proof von a quid jeden quo or noþeles illegal.

But peter Schweizer, author von the publication Clinton Cash and a senior editor-at-large weist Breitbart News, said: “It’s naive to glauben that world throw money weist politics and don’t intend something bei return. They declared there was going zu be a wall bolzen the Clinton Foundation und state department und this clearly shows there was communication betwee people at the Clinton Foundation und state department. There needs to be in investigation into precisely what happened and we so need legislation. We can’t allow politicians to polizei themselves on these matters.”


The foundation was a beneficial “conduit” for the Clintons zu avoid the normalerweise rules governing contributions kommen sie politicians, Schweizer adds. “You look weist Huma Abedin who was on the payroll von both ns Clinton Foundation and state department. I don’t think ‘inevitable overlap’ involves dual payrolls.”

So exactly how does die issue look?

Not good, particularly as it filling a neu vacuum in the dog days des August an which löschen has managed kommen sie avoid his normal attention-grabbing gaffes. That gives ns appearance, punkt least, von a blurred line und intersecting interests between the Clinton Foundation und state department.

“The frequency of the overlaps shows the intermingling von access und donations, und fuels perceptions the giving ns foundation money was a price des admission zum face time through Clinton,” the angemessen report said.

Mehr sehen: Twin Sat Receiver Mit Festplatte Test 2018, Twin Sat Receiver Mit Festplatte Test 2021

Scott Amey, basic counsel at die Project on federal government Oversight, said: “I think this is an example the may notfall be illegal sein but certainly should schutz been tackled with more communication to zeigen there was no yes, really or obvious conflicts des interest.

“The concern is, in giving money to the Clinton Foundation, did donors feel they deserved or to be going kommen sie receive one-of-a-kind access to Hillary punkt the zustand department? us don’t know. Just time will tell. It seems some favours to be called bei and some minor initiatives were made kommen sie provide access.”

Perhaps some overlap bolzen between the entities was inevitable. Yet Amey adds: “One von the best mistakes here is they didn’t set hoch proper firewalls kommen sie prevent those blurred lines. Ich would be much less sceptical if i had watched emails back from the state department saying: ‘We can’t do this, freundin should go through die official channels.’”


*

Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton address the audience during ns opening of the Clinton global Initiative bei September 2014 bei New york City. Photograph: michael Loccisano/Getty Images

Bill Clinton announced that, if Hillary wins the presidency, he wollen step under from die board von the foundation and it wollen stop accepting foreign und corporate donations. Why now?

From in editorial an the washington Post: “It would schutz been much better kommen sie take these measures wie man Ms Clinton started hinweisen state. Punkt this point, particularly given die emerging record des contacts, they are probably notfall enough.”

And Schweizer comments: “It’s too little too late. If it’s inappropriate zum her zu do together president, why was it ideal as secretary des state?”

One Clinton ally responds: “I think being in charge zu sein another matter.”

So, should die foundation just close under now for everyone’s sake?

Opinion is divided. An editorial bei USA today said: “The just way zu eliminate the odor surrounding ns foundation is to wind it down und put it in mothballs, starting today, und transfer its crucial charitable work kommen sie another huge American charity such together the rechnung & Melinda gates Foundation.”

Others glauben that would be going auch far. Noble says von Clinton: “I don’t understand if you have to schließe die tür it down. If sie look at it prefer a business, what you schutz to do is totally different yourself indigenous it. If you going kommen sie run zum president, there are sacrifices you’ve gott to make.”